De vises at i lande hvor man ikke k

De vises at i lande hvor man ikke kan få fat på våben nemt, giver mindre risiko for drab, mens lande med nemt tilgængelighed giver større risiko for drab. Det burde være begrensninger på hvilke våben man kan købe, og antal af våben.

Results (English) 1:

They appear in countries where it is not possible to get hold of weapons easy, gives less risk for homicide, while countries with easy availability gives greater risk of homicide. It should be begrensninger on which weapons you can buy, and number of weapons.

Results (English) 2:

They appear that in countries where you can not get hold of weapons easily, reducing the risk of killing, while countries with easy accessibility increases the risk of homicide. It should be Limitations on what weapons you can buy, and number of weapons.

Results (English) 3:

They appear in countries where it is not possible to get a hold of weapons easily, provides less risk to the killings, while countries with easy availability leads to greater risks of killing. It should be begrensninger on what weapons you can buy, and the number of weapons.