Derefter bevæger han sig over i log

Derefter bevæger han sig over i logos. Krisen er højaktuel og truende. Han taler om de ansvarlige for denne krise, dog peger han ikke på en person, men siger at dette er vores manglende, fælles evne til at træffe barske beslutninger. På denne lidt belærende måde, får han folket til at forstå, at det er et fælles ansvar at lede USA.

Results (English) 1:

Then he moves into logos. The crisis is of great interest and threatening. He talks about the people responsible for this crisis, however, he is not pointing at someone, but says that this is our failure, common ability to make tough decisions. On this somewhat didactic manner, he gets people to understand that it is a shared responsibility to lead the United States.

Results (English) 2:

Then he moves into logos. The crisis is highly topical and threatening. He speaks of those responsible for this crisis, however, he points not to a person but say that this is our lack of common ability to make tough decisions. This little didactic way, he gets people to understand that it is a shared responsibility to lead the United States.

Results (English) 3:

He then moves on to logos. The crisis is highly topical and threatening. He is talking about those who are responsible for this crisis, however, he is not a person, but says that this is our lack of, common ability to take tough decisions. In this a little didactic way, he will have the people to understand that this is a joint responsibility to lead the USA.